Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Max Purcell vs Henri Laaksonen Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Purcell vs Laaksonen analysis and find out who is favored!
Max Purcell vs Henri Laaksonen Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Purcell 1 - 0 Laaksonen
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Purcell has won 52.51% of points on their second serve, while Laaksonen has won 31.71%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Purcell, in recent form, has won 45.43% of their opponent's second serve points, while Laaksonen has won 38.46%. The same stats for first serve returns are 26% and 17.54% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Purcell has saved 61.63% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Laaksonen has saved 33.33% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Purcell has won 40.74% of matches played (W/L 22/ 32), with Laaksonen winning 26.09% (W/L 6/ 17) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Purcell has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 59% (W/L 205/ 142), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 51% (W/L 20/ 19). Laaksonen has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 59% (W/L 123/ 87), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 15% (W/L 2/ 11).
- Player level: In the last year, Purcell has played most of their matches on the Main tour, winning 34.62% of matches (W/L 9/ 17), where as Laaksonen has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 27.27% of matches (W/L 6/ 16). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Purcell winning 1 times and Laaksonen being victorious 0 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Purcell winning 2 and Laaksonen winning 1. The last match between Purcell and Laaksonen was at the Abierto de Tenis Mifel - Los Cabos, 01-08-2022, First, Hard with Max Purcell getting the victory 6-3 3-6 6-4.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 2:3:4.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Purcell and Laaksonen have played a deciding set 1 times, with Purcell winning 1 times and Laaksonen 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Purcell winning 0, and Laaksonen 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Purcell has played against opponents with an average rank of 191 while Laaksonen has played against players with an average rank of 341.22.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Purcell has won 55% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Laaksonen has won 44% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Purcell has converted 31.65% of breakpoint opportunities, and Laaksonen has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
94
Rank
40
High
26
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
1
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
780
Rank
84
High
32
Age
R
Plays
L
W
L
L
W
L
W
W
L
L
Form
W
W
L
L
W
L
L
L
L
L
57% (275-206)
Career Total W/L
53% (443-389)
38% (9-15)
YTD W/L
0% (0-2)
$936,175
Career Prize Money
$1,218,340
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Max Purcell | Henri Laaksonen |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 1 |
| Games Won | 15 | 13 |
| Aces (Total) | 9 | 8 |
| DFs (Total) | 3 | 5 |
| Avg Match Time | 2:3:4 | 2:3:4 |
| 1st Serve % | 70% (62/88) | 43% (34/79) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 71% (44/62) | 71% (24/34) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 35% (9/26) | 53% (24/45) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 57% (4/7) | 60% (3/5) |
| Return Points W% | 39% (31/79) | 40% (35/88) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-3 3-6 6-4 |
Stats 
Max Purcell
Player
Henri Laaksonen
70%
(
62 of
88)
1st Serve %
43%
(
34 of
79)
9
Aces
8
3
Double Faults
5
71%
(
44 of
62)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
24 of
34)
35%
(
9 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
24 of
45)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
40%
(
35 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
31 of
79)
84
Total Points Won
83
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Max Purcell | Henri Laaksonen |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 38% (9/15) | 0% (0/2) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 38% (25/40) | 0% (0/4) |
| Games Win/Loss | 46% (288/342) | 25% (8/24) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 35% (6/11) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 40% (2/3) | 0% (0/2) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 50% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.57 | 0.06 |
| Aces Total | 176 | 1 |
| DFs per game | 0.21 | 0.63 |
| DFs Total | 65 | 10 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:52:23 | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 213.29 | 368.5 |
| 1st Serve % | 57% (1123/1978) | 58% (57/98) |
| 1st Serve W% | 71% (797/1123) | 61% (35/57) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 53% (449/855) | 32% (13/41) |
| BPs Won% Total | 32% (44/139) | 0% (0/4) |
| Return Pts W% | 33% (626/1901) | 26% (25/96) |
| Slam W/L | 33% (1/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 25% (1/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 36% (4/7) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 50% (3/3) | 0% (0/2) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 38% (8/21) | 0% (0/2) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 33% (1/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 50% (4/8) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 64% (7/11) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 71% (7/5) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 29% (7/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 24% (17/4) | 0% (2/0) |
Max Purcell Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Henri Squire
Player
Max Purcell
64%
(
96 of
149)
1st Serve %
52%
(
82 of
157)
10
Aces
7
6
Double Faults
3
71%
(
68 of
96)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
53 of
82)
57%
(
30 of
53)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
42 of
75)
58%
(
7 of
12)
Break Points Won
38%
(
5 of
13)
34%
(
51 of
149)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
62 of
157)
160
Total Points Won
146
|
6-2 6-2 3-6 4-6 7-6(10) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Illya Marchenko
Player
Max Purcell
65%
(
33 of
51)
1st Serve %
70%
(
40 of
57)
10
Aces
7
1
Double Faults
2
91%
(
30 of
33)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
27 of
40)
56%
(
10 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
10 of
17)
22%
(
2 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
22%
(
11 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
20 of
57)
60
Total Points Won
48
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Max Purcell
Player
Remy Bertola
57%
(
52 of
92)
1st Serve %
66%
(
70 of
106)
11
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
1
83%
(
43 of
52)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
45 of
70)
48%
(
19 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
19 of
36)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
33%
(
30 of
92)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
42 of
106)
104
Total Points Won
94
|
6-3 4-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Max Purcell
Player
James Kent Trotter
72%
(
63 of
87)
1st Serve %
53%
(
49 of
92)
10
Aces
8
3
Double Faults
7
67%
(
42 of
63)
1st Serve Won
78%
(
38 of
49)
63%
(
15 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
14 of
43)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
34%
(
30 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
40 of
92)
97
Total Points Won
82
|
6-7(3) 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Egor Gerasimov
Player
Max Purcell
60%
(
28 of
47)
1st Serve %
58%
(
49 of
85)
9
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
2
89%
(
25 of
28)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
28 of
49)
63%
(
12 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
18 of
36)
23%
(
3 of
13)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
21%
(
10 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
39 of
85)
76
Total Points Won
56
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Max Purcell
Player
Fajing Sun
53%
(
40 of
75)
1st Serve %
52%
(
43 of
83)
7
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
4
73%
(
29 of
40)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
22 of
43)
60%
(
21 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
24 of
40)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
33%
(
25 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
37 of
83)
87
Total Points Won
71
|
4-6 6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Brandon Holt
Player
Max Purcell
54%
(
38 of
70)
1st Serve %
48%
(
30 of
62)
7
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
2
71%
(
27 of
38)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
22 of
30)
56%
(
18 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
13 of
32)
27%
(
3 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
8)
36%
(
25 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
27 of
62)
72
Total Points Won
60
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Sebastian Korda
Player
Max Purcell
67%
(
28 of
42)
1st Serve %
62%
(
41 of
66)
5
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
0
93%
(
26 of
28)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
24 of
41)
71%
(
10 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
14 of
25)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
14%
(
6 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
28 of
66)
64
Total Points Won
44
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Max Purcell
Player
Marcos Giron
52%
(
52 of
100)
1st Serve %
61%
(
59 of
97)
6
Aces
9
2
Double Faults
1
77%
(
40 of
52)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
45 of
59)
56%
(
27 of
48)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
20 of
38)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
33%
(
33 of
100)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
32 of
97)
99
Total Points Won
98
|
4-6 6-4 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Michael Mmoh
Player
Max Purcell
71%
(
39 of
55)
1st Serve %
48%
(
31 of
65)
7
Aces
5
0
Double Faults
4
82%
(
32 of
39)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
22 of
31)
63%
(
10 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
16 of
34)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
24%
(
13 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
27 of
65)
69
Total Points Won
51
|
6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
view more
Henri Laaksonen Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Toby Alex Kodat
Player
Henri Laaksonen
55%
(
28 of
51)
1st Serve %
57%
(
24 of
42)
6
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
4
75%
(
21 of
28)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
14 of
24)
61%
(
14 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
11%
(
2 of
18)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
31%
(
16 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
26 of
42)
61
Total Points Won
32
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Norbert Gombos
Player
Henri Laaksonen
64%
(
29 of
45)
1st Serve %
59%
(
33 of
56)
7
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
6
90%
(
26 of
29)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
21 of
33)
63%
(
10 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
11 of
23)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
20%
(
9 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
24 of
56)
60
Total Points Won
41
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Cem Ilkel
Player
Henri Laaksonen
65%
(
22 of
34)
1st Serve %
45%
(
18 of
40)
3
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
0
86%
(
19 of
22)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
13 of
18)
50%
(
6 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
8 of
22)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
26%
(
9 of
34)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
19 of
40)
44
Total Points Won
30
|
6-2 3-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Albert Ramos-Vinolas
Player
Henri Laaksonen
59%
(
44 of
74)
1st Serve %
58%
(
52 of
89)
2
Aces
6
3
Double Faults
3
70%
(
31 of
44)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
36 of
52)
47%
(
14 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
15 of
37)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
39%
(
29 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
38 of
89)
83
Total Points Won
80
|
6-4 3-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Enrico Dalla Valle
Player
Henri Laaksonen
73%
(
61 of
84)
1st Serve %
59%
(
70 of
119)
3
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
5
79%
(
48 of
61)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
43 of
70)
57%
(
13 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
25 of
49)
27%
(
4 of
15)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
27%
(
23 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
51 of
119)
112
Total Points Won
91
|
6-7(5) 6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Henri Laaksonen
Player
Goncalo Falcao
62%
(
21 of
34)
1st Serve %
53%
(
23 of
43)
4
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
5
67%
(
14 of
21)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
11 of
23)
85%
(
11 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
5 of
20)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
26%
(
9 of
34)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
27 of
43)
52
Total Points Won
25
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Joao Domingues
Player
Henri Laaksonen
45%
(
30 of
66)
1st Serve %
45%
(
40 of
89)
0
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
6
73%
(
22 of
30)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
28 of
40)
64%
(
23 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
22 of
49)
22%
(
2 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
32%
(
21 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
39 of
89)
84
Total Points Won
71
|
7-6(2) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Moez Echargui
Player
Henri Laaksonen
56%
(
48 of
86)
1st Serve %
64%
(
45 of
70)
1
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
0
60%
(
29 of
48)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
25 of
45)
50%
(
19 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
11 of
25)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
44%
(
38 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
34 of
70)
82
Total Points Won
74
|
2-6 6-0 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Henri Laaksonen
Player
Kirill Kivattsev
52%
(
44 of
85)
1st Serve %
55%
(
48 of
87)
5
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
2
77%
(
34 of
44)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
25 of
48)
46%
(
19 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
21 of
39)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
38%
(
32 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
41 of
87)
94
Total Points Won
78
|
6-3 4-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Henri Laaksonen
Player
Jesse Flores
52%
(
24 of
46)
1st Serve %
43%
(
23 of
53)
2
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
5
75%
(
18 of
24)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
16 of
23)
73%
(
16 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
12 of
30)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
26%
(
12 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
25 of
53)
59
Total Points Won
40
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Purcell Vs Laaksonen Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
